Ten Terrible Things About Tom Tiffany

Longtime right-wing politician, current U.S. Representative, and now Wisconsin gubernatorial wanna-be Tom Tiffany has said a lot of unseemly things and cast many bad votes over the years. 

wisconsin republican tom tiffany talking with his mouth slightly open
wisconsin republican tom tiffany talking with his mouth slightly open

MADISON, Wis. — Longtime right-wing politician, current U.S. Representative, and now Wisconsin gubernatorial wanna-be Tom Tiffany has said a lot of unseemly things and cast many bad votes over the years.

A Better Wisconsin Together Deputy Director Mike Browne commented, “Tom Tiffany can run for Governor, but he can’t hide from his record. Time and again he’s taken terrible votes and supported terrible policies that do harm to working people, families and our communities here in Wisconsin.”

The following are just ten of the terrible things about Tom Tiffany’s record:

# # #

A Better Wisconsin Together is a state-based research and communications hub for progressives and is an affiliate of ProgressNow.

Pat Snyder resting his head on his hand
Pat Snyder resting his head on his hand

New Polls Find Voters in Key Wisconsin State Legislative Districts Disapprove of MAGA Agenda, Dissatisfied with GOP Incumbents

Poll found nearly universal dissatisfaction with legislative Republicans' performance

wisconsin republican tom tiffany talking with his mouth open
wisconsin republican tom tiffany talking with his mouth open

OP-ED: Tom Tiffany’s Terrible Record on Abortion Rights

Tiffany has repeatedly tried to ban abortion

Image related to ICYMI: WI Republicans Voted in Lockstep with GOP Leaders After Receiving Significant Financial Support for Their Campaigns
Image related to ICYMI: WI Republicans Voted in Lockstep with GOP Leaders After Receiving Significant Financial Support for Their Campaigns

ICYMI: WI Republicans Voted in Lockstep with GOP Leaders After Receiving Significant Financial Support for Their Campaigns

GOP legislators voted against the best interests of their own constituents in order to vote in lockstep with the flow of campaign cash