Faced with a choice between partisanship and principles, Wisconsin’s conservatives justices pick partisanship every time

Even Patience Roggensack and Annette Ziegler cannot persuade Patience Roggensack and Annette Ziegler out of partisan hackery.

Image related to Faced with a choice between partisanship and principles, Wisconsin’s conservatives justices pick partisanship every time
Image related to Faced with a choice between partisanship and principles, Wisconsin’s conservatives justices pick partisanship every time

MADISON, Wis. — On Wednesday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court voted 4-3 to take original action in a redistricting lawsuit filed by the right-wing Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, which asks the Court to draw congressional and legislative lines if the Governor and Legislature fail to come to a resolution.  All four conservative justices voted to accept the case, while all three liberal justices voted against it. 

While there’s no lack of precedent for naked partisanship among the conservative majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, this case is particularly egregious. Conservative justices—including current members of the court Patience Roggensack and Annette Ziegler—expressed their alarm over politicization of the Court when previously asked by Republicans to intervene in redistricting litigation. 

Their forceful warnings ring even truer today than they did in 2009. Said Roggensack, involvement in redistricting litigation has the potential “to increase the political pressures on this court in a partisan way that is totally inconsistent with our jobs as nonpartisan judiciary.” Ziegler agreed, saying, “I’m concerned about the court acting kind of as a super-legislature.”

A Better Wisconsin Together Deputy Director Mike Browne commented, “Justices Roggensack and Ziegler were right in 2009 to be concerned about the politicization of the Court. They were wrong yesterday when they chose to advance the fortunes of their right wing political allies instead of heeding their own warnings. This rank hypocrisy and naked partisanship is the very reason for the erosion of the Court’s status as a nonpartisan institution. Instead of fairly calling balls and strikes, these right-wing judges want to pick winners and losers.”

# # #

A Better Wisconsin Together is a state-based research and communications hub for progressives and is an affiliate of ProgressNow.

Image related to OP-ED: It’s National Banned Books Week, and Here’s What You Need to Know About Tom Tiffany’s Record on the Issue
Image related to OP-ED: It’s National Banned Books Week, and Here’s What You Need to Know About Tom Tiffany’s Record on the Issue

OP-ED: It’s National Banned Books Week, and Here’s What You Need to Know About Tom Tiffany’s Record on the Issue

Not only was he recently caught scrubbing his website of his radical right-wing and unpopular beliefs, but he’s also trying to scrub away Wisconsin kids’ right to read

wisconsin republican tom tiffany with his eyes closed
wisconsin republican tom tiffany with his eyes closed

Tom Tiffany Flubs Attempt to Scrub His Right-Wing Extremism From the Internet

Unfortunately for Tom Tiffany, it’s going to take a lot more than scrubbing his record off of his website to make Wisconsinites forget how radically out of touch he is on the issues they care about.

wisconsin republican tom tiffany talking with his mouth open
wisconsin republican tom tiffany talking with his mouth open

Tom Tiffany Snagging Support of Right-Wing Billionaires, Special Interests, and Ethically Challenged Political Operatives in Gubernatorial Bid

Right-wing billionaires, special interests, and ethically challenged politicos seem to be coalescing around Tom Tiffany as their preferred Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate, based on the publicized list of hosts of a Friday fundraiser.